Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
/
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Banimmo SA is a real estate development company specializing in the acquisition, redevelopment, and management of undervalued or obsolete properties primarily in Belgium, with operations extending to France and Luxembourg. Incorporated in 2002 and headquartered in Brussels, the company focuses on technical and commercial renovations of low-value buildings, transforming them into modern office buildings, residential accommodations, warehouses, retail spaces, workshops, leisure facilities, and more. Its portfolio, valued at EUR 151.6 million at the end of 2024, spans 290,000 square meters and emphasizes creating flexible, sustainable spaces that balance nature, people, and technology. Banimmo SA holds, leases, and sells these revitalized assets, contributing to urban renewal in key European markets. Operating as a subsidiary of Patronale Life NV, it maintains a lean team of three employees led by CEO Laurent Calonne, alongside key executives in operations and sustainability. Listed on Euronext Brussels since 2007, Banimmo SA plays a niche role in the real estate sector by unlocking value from underutilized properties through innovative redevelopment strategies.
€2.86
€0.06 (-2.05%)
EOD Jun 23, 2026 · Twelve Data
25.64% operating margin is above average. ROIC at 0.92%. Note that capital returns lag the margin, the business may be capital-intensive despite high margins.
Revenue growth slowed to 2.4%, essentially flat. Margins also contracted 2.6pp. This is a business that needs a catalyst.
At 41x earnings, the current multiple leaves limited room for execution misses or growth deceleration. Free cash flow declined 620% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened.
40.9x earnings. The market is pricing in years of above-average growth. If that thesis breaks, downside from multiple compression alone could be 30%+. This is a stock where you're paying for the future, not the present.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
€7M
▲ +2.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
€52K
▼ -98.2% YoY
Op. Margin
25.64%
▼ -2.6pp YoY
ROIC
0.92%
▼ -0.5pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-€23M
▼ -619.6% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
€5M
▲ +6.7% YoY
Net Debt
€108M
Cash & Equiv.
€3M
3Y CAGR: +15.5%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 40.9, Banimmo SA (BANI.XBRU)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Banimmo SA scores 42/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Banimmo SA scores 42 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, passing 2 of 7 checks, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 25.6% operating margin and a 0.9% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full check-by-check breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh BANI.XBRU's valuation and scores 42/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.