Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
/
Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Gascogne S.A. is an industrial company specializing in the production and distribution of paper and packaging products. This French-based company plays a pivotal role in supplying sustainable and eco-friendly packaging solutions made from natural resources. Gascogne S.A. operates through two main divisions: the Packaging division and the Wood division, emphasizing sustainable forest management and innovative paper production methods. The Packaging division focuses on manufacturing a wide range of products, including heavy-duty kraft paper, industrial packaging, and flexible packaging solutions. These products are widely used in various industries such as food and beverage, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals, making the company a crucial player in sectors that demand rigorous quality and sustainability standards. In the financial market, Gascogne S.A. serves as an example of a company dedicated to integrating environmentally responsible practices with profitable business operations. Its commitment to sustainable forestry and recycling processes reflects its role in promoting green business practices within the packaging industry. By balancing economic objectives with environmental stewardship, Gascogne S.A. contributes to the industry's shift towards more sustainable operational models, filling a strategic niche in the market.
€2.10
+€0.00 (+0.00%)
EOD Sep 11, 2026
Operating margin is thin at 1.16%. Limited cushion if revenue slows or costs rise, not the profile of a wide-moat business.
Revenue declined 4.9% YoY. Margins deteriorated 3.1pp alongside, both lines moving the wrong way.
ROIC dropped from 4.54% to 0.86%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Negative free cash flow of -€43M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
€391M
▼ -4.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-€625K
▼ -106.5% YoY
Op. Margin
1.16%
▼ -3.1pp YoY
ROIC
0.86%
▼ -3.7pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-€43M
▲ +10.9% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-€12M
▼ -131.5% YoY
Net Debt
€149M
Cash & Equiv.
€105M
3Y CAGR: -0.6%
Continue Research
Gascogne (ALBI.XPAR)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Gascogne scores 8/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Gascogne scores 8 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 1.2% operating margin and a 0.9% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh ALBI.XPAR's valuation and scores 8/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.