Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Advanced Blockchain AG is a technology company specializing in blockchain development and consulting services across various industries. Its primary function is to harness the power of distributed ledger technology to create innovative solutions for complex challenges within sectors such as finance, supply chain, and telecommunications. The company offers a broad spectrum of blockchain-based products and services, ranging from smart contract development to decentralized finance applications. Advanced Blockchain AG plays a pivotal role in driving digital transformation by providing tailored blockchain solutions that enhance transparency, security, and efficiency for organizations. By operating at the cutting edge of blockchain technology, the company supports enterprises in integrating and leveraging this technology to optimize processes and stay competitive in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. Based in Germany and involved in a growing international market, Advanced Blockchain AG contributes significantly to advancing the adoption and implementation of blockchain technology worldwide, reinforcing its importance in the global market of next-generation digital infrastructure.
€1.17
+€0.00 (+0.17%)
EOD Aug 17, 2026
11.70% operating margin is respectable but not wide. ROIC at 10.76%. Suggests the business covers its cost of capital, but doesn't point to a wide moat.
Revenue declined 14.4% YoY. Margins deteriorated 24.8pp alongside, both lines moving the wrong way.
ROIC dropped from 61.12% to 10.76%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Operating margin contracted 24.8pp YoY, cost discipline may be slipping.
2.4x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
€15M
▼ -14.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
€2M
▼ -66.4% YoY
Op. Margin
11.70%
▼ -24.8pp YoY
ROIC
10.76%
▼ -50.4pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow
N/A
Net Debt
-€1M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
€4M
3Y CAGR: +192.8%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 2.4, Advanced Blockchain (ABX.XETR)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Advanced Blockchain scores 56/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Advanced Blockchain scores 56 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 11.7% operating margin and a 10.8% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh ABX.XETR's valuation and scores 56/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.