Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Foci Fiber Optic Communications, Inc. is a technology company specializing in the research, development, manufacturing, and sale of fiber optic components and systems. Founded in 1995 and headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan, the company operates within the electrical products sector, focusing on communications and networking. Its core offerings include a broad range of optical fiber passive components, such as connectors, patch cords, couplers, splitters, and wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) products, alongside advanced optical modules and subassemblies for high-speed data transmission. Foci also produces active optical cables (AOC) for use in data centers and consumer applications, as well as test instruments and micro-optic devices. Beyond manufacturing, the company provides system integration, consulting, and technical services related to fiber optic networks. Foci’s products serve critical roles in telecommunication infrastructure, data centers, and silicon photonics ecosystems, supplying markets in Taiwan, mainland China, the Americas, and globally. By advancing high-density, high-bandwidth interconnection technologies, Foci Fiber Optic Communications, Inc. supports the robust expansion and reliability of modern digital communications.
TWD 587.00
TWD 37.00 (-5.93%)
Live · 05:58 AM
Operating margin is thin at 0.03%. Limited cushion if revenue slows or costs rise, not the profile of a wide-moat business.
Revenue up 38.7% YoY with margins expanding 6.9pp.
At 3699x earnings, the current multiple leaves limited room for execution misses or growth deceleration. Negative free cash flow of -TWD 243M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
3699.0x earnings. The market is pricing in years of above-average growth. If that thesis breaks, downside from multiple compression alone could be 30%+. This is a stock where you're paying for the future, not the present.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
TWD 1.89B
▲ +38.7% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
TWD 16M
▲ +133.5% YoY
Op. Margin
0.03%
▲ +6.9pp YoY
ROIC
0.01%
▲ +3.0pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-TWD 243M
▼ -65.1% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-TWD 92M
▲ +33.7% YoY
Net Debt
-TWD 1.17B
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
TWD 1.43B
3Y CAGR: +5.3%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 3,699.0, 3363 (3363.XTAI)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, 3363 scores 25/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
3363 scores 25 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 0.0% operating margin and a 0.0% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh 3363.XTAI's valuation and scores 25/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.